SEC Charges Goldman Sachs With Fraud On Subprime Mortgages, Paulson & Co. Implicated
The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Goldman, Sachs & Co. and one of its vice presidents for defrauding investors by misstating and omitting key facts about a financial product tied to subprime mortgages as the U.S. housing market was beginning to falter. Read more including the full lawsuit at Zero Hedge.
~ ~ ~
"If you think that Goldman’s problems are not shared by the entire derivative market, you are bonkers."
"If you see the Goldman situation as negative to gold you are a total fool."
"If you see the Goldman situation as being bullish to the dollar, you are hopeless." -- Jim Sinclair
The Goldman fraud indictment is obviously huge news.....?
The Connecticut Attorney general wants to file criminal charges:
And New York might not be far behind.
ProPublica points out that other major banks did the same thing as Goldman.
Shahien Nasiripour writes:
Securities fraud charges against Goldman Sachs are just the beginning as federal regulators and investigators comb through the wreckage of a fraud-induced recession, caused by a pervasive and systemic culture of deceit at Wall Street's biggest firms, say Wall Street analysts.
Are the prosecutions finally starting? Is the dam finally breaking? Has Goldman really been sacked?
But Tyler Durden thinks it's all bread and circuses.
And as Mish points out (edited slightly for readability):
Here is a list of some of the things the SEC has ignored.∙ Secret Deals Involving No One; AIG Coverup Conspiracy Unravels
∙ Questions Geithner Cannot Escape
∙ Time To Indict Geithner For Securities Fraud
∙ Bernanke Guilty of Coercion and Market Manipulation
∙ Paulson Admits Coercion; Where are the Indictments?
∙ Bernanke Suffers From Selective Memory Loss; Paulson Calls Bank of America "Turd in the Punchbowl"
∙ Let the Criminal Indictments Begin: Paulson, Bernanke, Lewis
We need a complete ethics overhaul but we will not see it until people are thrown into prison and corporations have to choose which business they want to be in as opposed to the current state of affairs where anything for a profit is acceptable.
- Firms give advice based on how much profit the firms will make on it
- Firms trade their own books to the detriment of clients
- Firms make upgrades and downgrades after they take positions themselves
- Firms front-run trades
- Firms engage in dark pools
- Firms deemed too big to fail take advantage by upping leverage
- Firms like Goldman Sachs (which is nothing more than a giant hedge fund with no ethics) have access to Fed funds at low interest rates to do whatever the hell they please
Is someone finally standing up to the vampire squids of the world?
Or is this yet another p.r. stunt, where deals will be cut, a few low-level patsies will be convicted, and business as usual will continue?
Only time will tell ...