Vlad Putin's message to the world…
Predictably, Vlad Putin's speech began by discussing the recent events in
Crimea including the results of the referendum. He spoke about what Crimea and
Sevastopol meant for the Russian history, culture and nation, and he recalled
the horrors suffered by the Tatar people during the Soviet era. He then
outlined the circumstances in which Nikita Khrushchev single-handedly (and
illegally) transferred Crimea from the Russian Federation to the Ukraine and
how, after the fall of the Soviet Union the Ukraine suffered under the rule of
corrupt leaders. And then he explained how the legitimate protests of the
Ukrainian people were literally hijacked by very different and violent people:
I understand those who came out on Maidan with
peaceful slogans against corruption, inefficient state management and poverty.
The right to peaceful protest, democratic procedures and elections exist for
the sole purpose of replacing the authorities that do not satisfy the people.
However, those who stood behind the latest events in Ukraine had a different
agenda: they were preparing yet another government takeover; they wanted to
seize power and would stop short of nothing. They resorted to terror, murder
and riots. Nationalists, neo-Nazis, Russophobes and anti-Semites executed this
coup. They continue to set the tone in Ukraine to this day (...) we can all
clearly see the intentions of these ideological heirs of Bandera, Hitler’s
accomplice during World War II.
This reference to WWII is not just a politician's
rhetorical exaggeration aimed at eliciting a knee-jerk reaction from the
audience, it is something much more important – an unambiguous statement that
today, just as during WWII, the very existence of Russia as a country, a
culture and a nation was at stake… Of course, the threat to Russia does not
come from a few baseball bat wielding nationalist thugs in Kiev or from the new
regime in power, if only because this new regime is a complete fiction anyway:
It is also obvious that there is no legitimate
executive authority in Ukraine now, nobody to talk to. Many government agencies
have been taken over by the impostors, but they do not have any control in the
country, while they themselves – and I would like to stress this – are often
controlled by radicals. In some cases, you need a special permit from the
militants on Maidan to meet with certain ministers of the current government.
This is not a joke – this is reality. Those who opposed the coup were
immediately threatened with repression…
So where does the real danger come from and who is the
real aggressor threatening Russia at least as much has Hitler did in WWII?
Before answering that question, I would like to note that Vlad Putin made a
rather candid admission about the so-called “polite armed men in green”. He
said:(emphasis added)….
The President of the Russian Federation received
permission from the Upper House of Parliament to use the Armed Forces in
Ukraine. However, strictly speaking, nobody has acted on this permission
yet. Russia’s Armed Forces never entered Crimea; they were there already in
line with an international agreement. True, we did enhance our forces
there; however – this is something I would like everyone to hear and know – we
did not exceed the personnel limit of our Armed Forces in Crimea, which is
set at 25,000, because there was no need to do so.
So the mystery of the “polite armed men in green” is
now solved: “strictly speaking” they were an “enhancement” to the Russian
forces in Crimea which did not exceed the maximal total number of troops
allowed by the treaty with the Ukraine. In other words, the number of Spetsnaz
GRU troops sent to Crimea was within the terms of the treaty and the other
forces seen were, indeed, local self-defense units and not part of the Russian
military. Elegant formulation, for sure…
Vlad Putin then quoted the position of the UN International Court and the
United States on the issue of the secession of Kosovo: “General international
law contains no prohibition on declarations of independence” (UNIC) and “
Declarations of independence may, and often do, violate domestic legislation.
However, this does not make them violations of international law” (USA) and
added:
For some reason, things that Kosovo Albanians (and we
have full respect for them) were permitted to do, Russians, Ukrainians and
Crimean Tatars in Crimea are not allowed. Again, one wonders why….
Here we are getting at the core of his argument: the
Empire has no other use for International Law then to use it as a fig leaf for
its project of world hegemony and when that is not possible, then the Empire
simply ignores it and uses brute force:
This is not even double standards; this is amazing,
primitive, blunt cynicism. One should not try so crudely to make everything
suit their interests, calling the same thing white today and black tomorrow (…)
After the dissolution of bipolarity on the planet, we no longer have stability.
Key international institutions are not getting any stronger; on the contrary,
in many cases, they are sadly degrading. Our western partners, led by the
United States of America, prefer not to be guided by international law in their
practical policies, but by the rule of the gun. They have come to believe in
their exclusivity and exceptionalism, that they can decide the destinies of the
world, that only they can ever be right. They act as they please: here and
there, they use force against sovereign states, building coalitions based on
the principle “If you are not with us, you are against us.” To make this
aggression look legitimate, they force the necessary resolutions from
international organizations, and if for some reason this does not work, they
simply ignore the UN Security Council and the UN overall. (…) We understand
what is happening; we understand that these actions were aimed against Ukraine
and Russia and against Eurasian integration (…) we have every reason to assume
that the infamous policy of containment, led in the 18th, 19th and 20th
centuries, continues today. They are constantly trying to sweep us into a
corner because we have an independent position, because we maintain it and
because we call things like they are and do not engage in hypocrisy... But
there is a limit to everything. And with Ukraine, our western partners have
crossed the line, playing the bear and acting irresponsibly and
unprofessionally.
Amazing words coming from the President of a
nuclear-armed superpower: not only does he denounce the complete and total
hypocrisy of the AngloZionist Empire, he even places it in the direct
continuation of three centuries of anti-Russian policies by Western European
powers! Not only does he denounce the Empire's double-standards, he even openly
ridicules the incompetence of its leaders:
After all, they were fully aware that there are
millions of Russians living in Ukraine and in Crimea. They must have really
lacked political instinct and common sense not to foresee all the consequences
of their actions. Russia found itself in a position it could not retreat from.
If you compress the spring all the way to its limit, it will snap back hard.
You must always remember this.
Indeed, one can only wonder what in the world they
were thinking in the “imperial high command” when they decided to use Nazis in
the Ukraine just like they used al-Qaeda in Afghanistan: did they really think
that Russia would yield yet again? Did it even have such an option? Not
according to Vlad Putin:
It is at historic turning points such as these that a
nation demonstrates its maturity and strength of spirit… The Russian people
showed this maturity and strength through their united support for their
compatriots. Russia’s foreign policy position on this matter drew its firmness
from the will of millions of our people, our national unity and the support of
our country’s main political and public forces. (…) Obviously, we will
encounter external opposition, but this is a decision that we need to make for
ourselves. Are we ready to consistently defend our national interests, or will
we forever give in, retreat to who knows where? (…) Russia will also have to
make a difficult decision now, taking into account the various domestic and
external considerations. What do people here in Russia think? Here, like in any
democratic country, people have different points of view, but I want to make
the point that the absolute majority of our people clearly do support what is
happening.
Let's sum up. Vlad Putin has now openly stated that:
1) There is no limit to the hypocrisy, lies, evil, stupidity and aggressive
nature of the AngloZionist Empire.
2) That this Empire represents by its very nature an existential threat to
Russia.
3) That the Russian people are united in their determination to resist this disgusting
and utterly criminal Empire.
Frankly, to me this sounds very much like a declaration of war… Not
necessarily a hot war with military forces fighting each other, but something
more than a Cold War in which the status quo is an acceptable option. Vlad Putin
is suggesting that the next war will be a civilizational one, a cultural one
and even a moral one, a war in which one side will stand for absolute rule
of a cynical world hegemon and the other side for a multi-polar world in which
all countries are to be subjected to the same set of rules and principles. But
even more importantly than a single set of rules, the kind of international
system Russia is seeking to establish is one in which each nation, culture and
religion would have the actual, not just theoretical, freedom to live as it
want. He clearly said so in his 2013 annual Presidential address to the Federal Assembly
when he said:
Today, many nations are revising their moral values
and ethical norms, eroding ethnic traditions and differences between peoples
and cultures. Society is now required not only to recognize everyone’s right to
the freedom of consciousness, political views and privacy, but also to accept
without question the equality of good and evil, strange as it seems, concepts
that are opposite in meaning. This destruction of traditional values from above
not only leads to negative consequences for society, but is also essentially
anti-democratic, since it is carried out on the basis of abstract, speculative
ideas, contrary to the will of the majority, which does not accept the changes
occurring or the proposed revision of values. We know that there are more and
more people in the world who support our position on defending traditional
values that have made up the spiritual and moral foundation of civilization in
every nation for thousands of years: the values of traditional families, real
human life, including religious life, not just material existence but also
spirituality, the values of humanism and global diversity. Of course, this is a
conservative position. But speaking in the words of Nikolai Berdyaev, the point
of conservatism is not that it prevents movement forward and upward, but that
it prevents movement backward and downward, into chaotic darkness and a return
to a primitive state.
It is pretty clear that this last sentence expresses
Russia's view on the level of civilizational and cultural degradation the
AngloZionist Empire has imposed upon the people of Europe and the USA.
Furthermore, when Vlad Putin says that “destruction of traditional values
from above not only leads to negative consequences for society, but is also
essentially anti-democratic, since it is carried out on the basis of abstract,
speculative ideas, contrary to the will of the majority” he is clearly
stating that the AngoZionist Empire is not ruled by the people which live in
it, but by minorities, special interest groups, behind the scenes lobbies and
cabals who impose their warped agenda upon the rest of the people….
Again, the bottom line is this: the President of Russia has made an
open declaration of war against the 1% elite which currently is in control the
AngloZionist Empire. This war will be a multi-level one combining “soft
power” (cultural resistance, religious resistance, informational resistance,
financial and economic warfare) with “hard power” (a military ready fight the
US/NATO if needed, the use of the “energy weapon” to retaliate against economic
warfare). In an ironical twist of history, especially for a capitalist society
which has ridiculed Marx and repudiated the concept of class warfare, this
war will also profoundly be a class war in which oligarchs from different countries
will support each other and in which the regular, 99%, people will work
together on, for example, the “virtual battlefields” of the Internet.
The crucial battlefield: “global information operations”
“Information operations”
is the term used by the US military to refer to “direct and indirect support
operations for the United States Military”. Psychological operations, or
PSYOPs, are seen as a subset of IO. For our purposes, however, is to extend
this concept to not only military operations, but to the full spectrum of
national security policies of a country and, in our case, for the “deep state”
which holds the reins of power in the AngloZionist Empire. I will thus speak of
Global Information Operations or GIOs, the FDDC etc etc, the core component of
which is represented by the despicable western corporate media…
For a while in my life I, like many other people, made my days by, among other
things, reading the Soviet press every day. Not just the Pravda or Izvestia,
but also even more boring or specialized newspapers, magazines and reviews. I
listen to the Soviet radio as often as I could, and I never missed a chance to
watch the Soviet TV, especially the news shows. At the time I was young, very
naïve and very dumb, and I sincerely believed that the Soviet Union was a
mortal threat to western Europe and that the only thing which stood between
them, the evil commies, and us, the free world, was the military power of the
NATO alliance. Looking back at myself and the utter garbage I had in my brain
then, I feel embarrassed and, frankly, ashamed of my total credulity. But at
the time I was a dedicated soldier of the Cold War whose motto was “know thy
enemy”. And I knew my "enemy" really, really, well. I want to explain
all of the above before stating the following:
In all honesty and sincerity, I have to say here that in comparison to the
modern western corporate media the Soviet press was far more pluralistic, more
diverse and more trustworthy. True, the Soviet press simply did not mention
certain topics, but that goes to show that, unlike the western corporate media,
it did not feel that it could brazenly lie to the point where even what is
obvious is categorically and totally denied. For one thing, the Soviet public
was far better educated. We all, including myself, used to poke fun at the
obligatory lessons in Marxism-Leninism in Soviet schools, but we overlooked
that any halfway decent course in Marxism-Leninism will include topics like
dialectics, historical materialism and economics: stuff that makes you think.
This is not to say that the Soviet people could not be lied to – they could and
they have been – but only that the lies had to be at least halfway credible and
present a plausible scenario. In contrast, for a public raised on CNN, BBC or
MTV, CNBC, NTV, etc etc, the lies need not be even capable of passing a basic
common sense test (as is so vividly illustrated by the western corporate
media's coverage of the 08.08.08 war or the events in the Ukraine): the Doublethink
predicted by Orwell in his book 1984 is
now fully upon us and black can be called white and vice-versa with no problems
at all. I would even argue that, in comparison, even the Nazi Völkischer
Beobachter contained more information than, say, the NYT, WSJ or the BBC,
etc etc etc whose level of brazen lying I could only compare to, maybe, the Der
Stürmer.
I first noticed this absolutely unprecedented level of outright lying by the
western corporate media during the US/NATO war on Yugoslavia (Croatia, Bosnia,
Kosovo), but I think that it has only gotten much worse since 2000…. In
contrast, the modern Russian press is extremely diverse and the people in
Russia are regularly shown the type of coverage the current events in the
Ukraine get in the western press and it leave them baffled. They simply cannot
understand how this is possible in a society which externally seems to have all
the characteristics of a free and pluralistic society. In the bad old days of
the USSR, it was all simple: there was state censorship. But there is no state
censorship in the West, no Glavlit
and no Goskomizdat,
and yet the western press is far more monolithic and dishonest then even the
official party press in the USSR. But there is one crucial difference between
the USSR and today's AngloZionist Empire: the Internet.
Simply put, the Internet is the only global media not controlled by either
governments or corporations (which is really the same thing). Yes, there
are numerous attempts by both governments and corporations to change this, but
at least for the time being, information is circulating freely throughout the
Internet. This introduced amazing changes:
1) a single citizen with a minimal income now has the means to meaningfully
oppose the lies of even major corporations or governments: the case of Alain
Soral in France is typical of this amazing trend.
2) the resistance to the Empire is now geographically decentralized: as this illustrates
so well with the amazing diversity of its readers.
3) information simply cannot be suppressed: the world learned of the massacres
and atrocities of the Wahhabi scum/insurgents in Syria even though the
corporate media tried hard to ignore them.
4) low-level classified government documents do regularly get compromised by
various individuals who can then leak it without anybody being able to stop it
(Assange, Snowden, Manning).
5) an increasing number of people sever their exposure to the corporate media
which now mostly subsists on government grants.
6) even those who still watch TV or read the press are aware that they are
being lied to daily for decades…
All this means that we live in a new reality in which the global AngloZionist
Empire is now actively opposed by a global resistance which knows no
borders, no nationalities and no religions: people from different countries,
nations and religions stand together against a common hegemon not just in
theory like in “Proletarians of all countries – unite!” slogan, but in
actuality and they actively collaborate with each other.
It is to this global resistance to the Empire and its GIOs that Vlad Putin
addressed his words. Sure, of course, he was primarily speaking to the
people of Russia, Crimea and the Ukraine, but he was also reaching far beyond,
to all those, probably many millions, who would make the effort to listen to
him on YouTube or read a transcript of his speech. Because, of course, all this
is much bigger than just a power struggle over a relatively small peninsula in
the Black Sea: yesterday, for the first time, a powerful and determined leader
openly told the Empire: we know you, we understand what you are trying to
do, and we are not going to let you do it. In fact, we reject everything you
stand for and we will never let you rule the planet. And today, we have the
means to stop you!
Dust storms reported world wide… LOL
I think that we are entering a new era which many of us had been hoping for a
very long time ago... An era when a resistance which used to be only local has
finally found a leader capable not of commanding it, no, but capable of
representing and inspiring it. I honestly don't think that Vlad Putin wanted
that. He would have much preferred to be in the shoes of Chinese President Xi
Jinping who fully supports Vlad Putin, but who prefers to avoid an open
confrontation with the Empire, at least until such time when China becomes
truly powerful. Iran and Hezbollah have been openly resisting for many years,
but they simply did not have the means to reach much further beyond the
Middle-East. As for the resistance in Latin America (Venezuela, Ecuador, Cuba,
Nicaragua, Bolivia) it has not been able to effectively deal with more lukewarm
or hesitating leaders (Brazil, Chile, Argentina) or with outright US puppet
states (Colombia). If anything, the recent vote at the UNSC in which only China
abstained and every other member voted against Russia goes to show that on the
global scale Russia is alone and that no world leader has the courage or guts
to openly stand next to Vlad Putin…
Even though I had been following Vlad Putin's career very carefully since 1999,
it took me until 2008 to fully get a sense of what this man was all about.
Still, I know that a lot of people remained skeptical: was he really what he
appeared to be or was he simply playing a sophisticated game of “good cop – bad
cop” with Medvedev, with each of them catering to their own audience? When
Russia was invited to the G8 and when it acceded to the WTO a lot of careful
observers wondered whether Vlad Putin was really as "anti-Empire" as
he claimed to be, or whether he was just conducting a hard bargain for better
conditions inside the Empire's international system. I hope that today these
skeptics see that Vlad Putin is “for real” and that he is now the de-facto
leader of the global resistance against the AngoZionist Empire.
As I have mentioned above, a lot of readers, with no personal connections to
Russia at all, reported yesterday that they had listened to Vlad Putin's
address with tears in their eyes. This resulted in a rather moving discussion
of red-eye triggering “dust storms” reported from various parts of the world
(Germany, USA, Uruguay, Austria, Canada and, of course, Russia). One though did
not want to use a cute euphemism and simply told me : “Here it wasn't a
dust, it was just a sincere pure cry for the hope of the all humanity around
the world, that we can live in peace, mutual respect , abundance and prosperity
for everyone around this beautiful earth. I do believe that this is the start
of the new era.” In other words: Vlad Putin – we heard you!
Conclusion – a victory which belongs to every free person…
First, let me be clear about this: what happened in Crimea is definitely a
victory, but only one in a much wider war which is far from over. The first
rule of warfare is to never underestimate your enemy and to never do what the
French call “sell the bear's skin before having killed it”. This is far
from over and if this is indeed the “beginning of the end” for the Empire, this
is still only the very beginning of a long and most dangerous process. Some
Empires die more or less peacefully, destroyed by economic ruin and over-reach,
but others need to be defeated in an orgy of violence. Though on my bad days I
sometimes daydream about seeing a private of the Russian army plant a Russian
flag on the Capitol as Meliton Kantaria
did over the Reichstag, I don't think that this would be much of a cause for
joy in the midst of a nuclear winter. So the task is to bring down the Empire
without bringing down the rest of the planet with it.
Those parts of the planet which have been “liberated” (Russia, Belarus,
Kazakhstan, China, Iran, etc.) need to resist, if needed by force, and remain
free. Those parts which are still fought over ( Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Venezuela,
etc.) need to continue their struggle, as for the rest of the world it needs to
continue its non-violent, ideological and informational resistance against the
Empire and it's lies. We can use the well-known image of a swarm of bees
attacking a large animal – individually the bees can do little, but in a
coordinated attack they can defeat and even kill the much larger animal.
In the meantime, yes, we can rejoice over our common victory this week and
paraphrase the words of Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah in his absolutely beautiful
“Divine Victory” speech and say: “We feel that we won; Russia won; Crimea
won; the Slavic nations won, and every oppressed, aggrieved person in this
world also won. It is not the victory of a party or a community; rather it is a
victory for true Russia, the true European people, and every free person in the
world. Don’t distort this big historic victory. Do not contain it in party,
sectarian, communal, or regional clans. This victory is too big to be
comprehended by us”.
There is a song about war as a metaphor for any resistance to evil and
brutality which is very popular in Russia called “A toast to” which has
the following words: (see home-made music video here) …..
Let's toast to life, come on brother, until the end
Let's toast to those who were with us then
Let's toast to life, and may
all wars be accursed!
We'll remember those
Who were with us then.
A toast to them, a toast to us
And to Siberia and the Caucasus
To light of distant cities
And to friendship and to love
A toast to you, a toast for us,
To the Airborne Troops and the Spetsnaz…
To combat decorations
Let's lift a toast, my old friend!
In the same spirit, I toast to you, in the resistance, and I wish you courage
and steadfastness in the long struggle ahead. But today, let us celebrate
indeed!...
