
Saturday, January 28, 2012
Iran, Saudi Arabia ink deal to develop joint oilfield....

Thursday, December 29, 2011
IRAN, a natural gas giant...

http://americanfootprints.com/wp/2009/08/engaging-the-muslim-world-the-struggle-for-islamic-oil/
Iran has threatened that it will retaliate against the Obama administration's proposed new economic sanctions on Iran's oil exports by blocking the flow of oil from the Persian Gulf. "If sanctions are adopted against Iranian oil," said Iran's Vice President Mohammad Reza Rahimi, "not a drop of oil will pass through the Strait of Hormuz," the narrow waterway at the mouth of the Persian Gulf, which one-fifth of the world's oil supply passes through daily.
To drive the point home, Iran has started a 10-day naval exercise in the Persian Gulf to show off how it could use small speedboats and a barrage of missiles to combat America's naval armada. And the U.S. Navy has responded, in the words of a spokeswoman: "Anyone who threatens to disrupt freedom of navigation in an international strait is clearly outside the community of nations; any disruption will not be tolerated."
This is a significant escalation of tension between the United States and Iran, and the start of a more dangerous phase in the West's attempt to curtail Iran's nuclear program.
The new sanctions are a response to last month's alarming report on Iran's nuclear intentions by the United Nations nuclear watchdog agency, the International Atomic Energy Association. The Obama administration has ruled out military strikes to stop Iran's nuclear program in favor of tougher sanctions, which, once signed by the president, and if fully implemented, would sharply reduce Iran's oil revenue. The administration sees this added pressure on Iran's fragile economy as an effective alternative to military strikes.
The administration's strategy is based on the assumption that cutting Iran out of the oil market will not substantially impact world oil supply and prices. Saudi Arabia can step up production to cover the loss of Iran's export of 2 million barrels a day.
But it is not clear whether Saudi Arabia actually would increase production to compensate for the loss of Iranian oil. Iran has clearly started a charm offensive with Riyadh to influence the Saudi decision. Iran's intelligence minister recently visited Riyadh to reduce tensions between the two countries in the wake of the alleged Iranian plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to Washington, and the Iranian Navy has claimed that it rescued a Saudi ship from pirates.
In facing off against the U.S. and its European allies, Iran thinks it holds economic cards of its own and is announcing loud and clear that if push comes to shove, it intends to use them.
Iran notes that Western economies are under stress and predicts they could not afford higher oil prices. Even the threat of disruption in oil supply would send energy prices spiraling sky high, and that would plunge the already struggling economies of the United States and Europe into deeper recession. Iran is hoping to change the conversation in Western capitals from how tightly to squeeze Iran to what could be the cost of doing so.
Nor would economic woes caused by conflict in the Persian Gulf remain limited to the West. Persian Gulf exports already account for 60% of Asia's energy consumption. Economies from India to China would be impacted by a Persian Gulf oil cutoff and higher energy prices. Iran is in effect threatening global economic crisis.
Those advocating new sanctions on Iran's oil industry have said little about the potential cost to the global economy. The cutoff would also hurt Gulf Cooperation Council countries and could drag them into a conflict with Iran they have thus far avoided. Iran hopes its saber-rattling will persuade Asia's economic powerhouses and Persian Gulf emirates to pressure Washington to back away from the new sanctions.
War between the U.S. and Iran may very well start, not if and when Washington decides to strike against Iran's nuclear facilities, but because sanctions designed as the alternative to military action end up hastening its advent. That might prove to be the least desired outcome, for no better reason than the possibility that the first casualty of another war in the Middle East might very well be economic recovery in U.S. and Europe....
Saturday, July 24, 2010
Iran, Turkey sign 1 billion euro gas pipeline deal

TEHRAN- July 2010 ) – Iran and Turkey signed a 1 billion euro ($1.29 billion) contract to build a pipeline that will transfer the Islamic state’s natural gas to Turkey, a statement by the Iranian Oil Ministry said on Friday.
“The one billion euros deal to build 660 km gas pipeline was signed on Thursday during the Iranian Oil Minister’s trip to Turkey,” the statement said.
The statement also said there were talks on exporting Iran’s natural gas to Europe via Turkey and other energy-related issues.
Turk Army Convoy Explosion Same Town As Iranian Pipeline Bombing...
Suspected Kurd rebels blow up Iran-Turkey gas pipeline Mined in pain attacks....
In rural areas of pain Dogubeyazit County during the passage of military vehicles was placed by terrorists to detonate explosives by remote control as a result of the search of the majors and captains, including four soldiers were injured.
Events today at 10.00 Dogubeyazit District Gendarme Commander, Gendarmerie Senior Captain Ufuk Gokmen’s determination is out in the task handed over to the Gendarmerie Major Zechariah liked with Sarıbıyık from the village gendarmerie outpost located the Fish Lake near Bezirhane village way has occurred. Igdir near the border region during the passage of military vehicles terrorists put off by remote control to detonate explosives had been.
The four soldiers in an explosion at a military vehicle were injured. The explosion injured soldiers District Gendarme Commander Captain Ufuk Gokmen and Specialist Sergeant Neset Fares’s helicopter was removed Erzurum Marshal Fevzi Cakmak Military Hospital, the Light wounded privates Samet Kara and Ali Şahin the Dogubayazit State Hospital, being treated was learned.
Governor: Remote Controlled Explosion....
Agri Governor Ali Yerlikaya, Dogubeyazit District Bezirhane Gendarmerie Station Command was sent by the two vehicles comprising the gendarmerie patrol today clockwise during Sarıbıyık villages near separatist terrorist organization by the members based explosives laid they said. During the detonation of explosives at a military vehicle passed four personnel injured while performing Yerlikaya Governor explaining the wounded were being transferred to the hospital, said the suspects were trying to be captured.
The projected 660 kilometer pipeline will be constructed within three years, allowing Iran to export 50 million to 60 million cubic meters (mcm) of gas daily to Turkey and Europe, by paying transit fees to Ankara.
Turkish Energy Minister Taner Yildiz clarified immediately that neither the Turkish government nor the state-owned pipeline company, BOTAS, was party to such an agreement. He noted earlier interest expressed by private companies in such a pipeline, and said that it might involve one of these companies and Iran. Nonetheless, it was unusual that he acted as though he had no knowledge of an agreement being signed, although it was publicized by the Iranian side.
Sitki Ayan, the chief executive of Som Petrol, the Turkish counterpart in the project, told the press that the company was party to a deal with Iran. He added that it will build a pipeline to the Turkish-Iranian border, and it was part of a larger multi-billion dollar project.
Iran has frequently expressed interest in exporting its gas to Europe, while Turkey has also stated its willingness to assist Iran. Ankara concluded an agreement with Tehran in November 2008 pertaining to the export of Iranian gas to Europe and to the joint exploitation of Iran's reserves. In particular, Turkey wanted to invest $5.5 billion in the South Pars field to produce 20-35 billion cubic meters (bcm) of gas annually. Ankara would receive operation rights for three offshore gas fields in South Pars.
Under United States pressure, Turkey shelved this agreement. It was rekindled in October 2009 during a visit to Tehran by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, defying objections from Washington.
Since October 2009, Turkey and Iran have held talks on the details of the agreement, yet the viability of this cooperation has proved to be controversial. Ankara argues that cooperation with Tehran was essential first and foremost to meet its energy needs. Iran is the second-largest supplier of natural gas to Turkey, following Russia. Moreover, such energy cooperation with Iran might also bolster European energy security, as Tehran could serve as a potential supplier for the European Union-backed Nabucco project. This argument is particularly relevant given the ongoing uncertainty concerning where Nabucco would secure its gas supplies.
Skeptics have suggested that Ankara's insistence on cooperation with Tehran was not realistic in the face of the US-led sanctions policy. Political disagreements aside, given Turkey's own limitations in this field, it might not be able to supply Iran with the sort of investment and technology needed to meet its requirements; hence, Iran could be no panacea to ensure European energy security in the short term.
The recently announced pipeline deal, provided that it succeeds, might secure fresh supplies to European markets. Yet several questions remain as to how it will be connected to the European grid. The most immediate alternative is the possible export of Iranian gas to Switzerland, which has been under consideration since 2008. Iran and a Swiss energy company signed a deal in March 2008. Following the Turkish-Iranian agreement, Turkey signed a memorandum of understanding with Switzerland, under which it would enable the transfer of up to 5.5 bcm of Iranian gas through its territory to Switzerland. The gas would use the proposed Trans-Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) network. Another option would be to integrate it with the Nabucco grid in the future.
The outcome of the talks on the joint development of the South Pars field, however, was not as promising. In March, Yildiz announced that Turkey commissioned feasibility studies and would have to make a final decision on whether to invest in South Pars within two weeks. It was rumored that the Iranian side also considered assigning the fields reserved for Turkey to domestic firms, as the possibility arose that the time period envisaged in the original agreement might expire.
Commenting on Mirkazemi's visit, Yildiz said that Turkey cancelled its plan to invest in the South Pars gas project, after failing to find common ground on the production and marketing of the gas. "In the future, there might be other possibilities to advance mutual interests in the South Pars field. Yet, the current project is over," Yildiz said.
Since these developments occurred against the background of a recent round of sanctions against Iran spearheaded by the US, it refocused attention on how Turkish energy cooperation with Iran is mired in Turkish-American relations.
The development of Iran's gas deposits has been hampered by the US policy of isolating the country. Partly because its quest to access foreign investments and advanced technology was thwarted, Iran not only failed to emerge as a leading exporter, but was also forced to import gas from Turkmenistan and, through a recent agreement, from Azerbaijan.
Although Turkey objected to US policy on the Iranian nuclear issue and voted against the UN Security Council resolution authorizing sanctions, it underlined that it would implement them. It is unclear whether this development played a direct role in Ankara's decision to cancel its investment in Iran. In any case, declining European interest in energy cooperation with Iran has possibly influenced this decision.
Since European countries do not necessarily view Iran as a supplier for Nabucco in the short term, the reduced interest might have affected Turkish policy. Moreover, European countries recently decided to tighten sanctions against Iran, including taking some restrictive measures in the oil and gas industry. This development may further restrict Ankara's room for maneuvering, given the questions over its ability to carry out investments with its own resources.








