Tuesday, September 6, 2011

The Ben Bernanke Fed is completely lost at sea..., Central bankers are trapped


The Ben Bernanke Fed is completely lost at sea..., Central bankers are trapped - and the markets fully appreciate that they have them trapped....

Icelandic president Olafur Grimsson says Iceland was "bullied" by banking shysters. What the world needs is a Khmer Rouge-style "killing field" for all the bank shysters and their enablers. Where's Pol Pot when you need him?


Confidence wearing thin since the inside job of 9/11....
By Doug Noland




"I favor being much clearer and specific about the economic markers that it would take to alter [the course of policymaking]... In fact, I argued for something like this just recently... We could allow rates to remain low until the unemployment rate fell to a certain level or if inflation became tremendously unacceptable at a higher rate." - Chicago Federal Reserve president Charles Evans (interviewed by CNBC's Steve Liesman)

On September 1, Marc Jones of Reuters reported: "Bundesbank President Jens Weidmann said... that trust in the European Central Bank could be lost if the euro zone central bank persists with crisis-fighting policies that go beyond its conventional role... He said the lines between central bank monetary policy and


governments' fiscal policy had been blurred as a result of the financial and euro zone debt crises. 'In the long run this strains the trust in the central banks, and therefore for monetary policy it matters that the additional risks that have been taken on [are] reduced again... ' Noting that the debt problems of weaker euro zone countries had been shared by the bloc's stronger states, he said this was not the way to maintain incentives for solid fiscal policy. 'Such a solution is not suitable to curtail the uncertainty on financial markets. Moreover, it exposes monetary policy to pressure to have a loose bias.'"

Global monetary policymaking is a complete mess. As for the US Federal Reserve, I won't this week be profiling Chicago Federal Reserve president Evans' interview with CNBC's Steve Liesman. In what is a really wacky idea, a dovish Evan's suggested the Fed could consider targeting a specific unemployment rate when setting monetary policy. Fed chairman Ben Bernanke has been a long-time advocate of having monetary policy target a pre-determined inflation rate ("inflation targeting"), and I have fully expected that such a mechanism at some point would be used to justify additional "accommodation"/monetization. However, at 3.6% year-on-year current elevated consumer price inflation creates an inopportune backdrop for proposing such a targeting mechanism. So, then, why not the unemployment rate - or home values or stock prices?

In Europe, the European Central Bank (ECB) now confronts a very serious dilemma. Ongoing (and evolving) financial crisis has forced the central bank to sidestep its policymaking doctrine, circumvent rules and dangerously expose itself to market, political and capital pressures. They today hold enormous quantities of securities and loans to European periphery governments and banks, exposure they had no intention of holding for anything other than for short-term liquidity-supporting purposes. Not only are they now stuck with these "trades-turned-long-term investments", they face overwhelming pressure for ongoing liquidity injections. In particular, they are left holding the bag filled with big exposure to Greek debt, as Greece Bailout II unravels and two-year Greek yields surge to 47%.

More problematically for the ECB, the European banking system, and global financial markets, a side deal struck early last month between the ECB and Italian President Silvio Berlusconi's government appears in peril. Apparently, the ECB agreed to support Italian debt in the marketplace in exchange for a commitment to more aggressive austerity measures from the Italians. After surging to a high of 6.20% on August 4, ECB buying was instrumental in pressing Italy's 10-year yields below 5% by mid-month.

Now, under intense political pressure, the Berlusconi government has backed away from key austerity measures. Complicating matters, Berlusconi leadership is jeopardized by ongoing criminal investigations and rising unpopularity. ECB president Jean-Claude Trichet on Friday warned that Italian fiscal and economic reform commitments were "extremely important" and "it is therefore essential that the objectives announced for the improvement of public finances be fully confirmed and implemented".

The ECB is said to have purchased almost $55 billion of Italian and Spanish bonds in the open market over the past few weeks. This has elicited strong rebuke from the German Bundesbank, especially after the ECB-induced bond rally took the pressure off Italian politicians. Italy's 10-year yields jumped 21 basis points (bps) last week to 5.27%, with Friday afternoon's 397 bps a record close for five-year Italian Credit Default Swap (CDS) prices. Having aggressively intervened in the marketplace, the ECB now faces the risk of market tumult if it shies away from its bond-buying program. At home and abroad, central bankers have allowed themselves to be taken hostage by (increasingly desperate) markets.

Come to the markets' rescue and there will be no turning back, especially in a bubble backdrop. Global central bankers will more vocally protest the state of fiscal mismanagement and "dysfunctional" markets, yet they largely have themselves to blame. For too long, central bankers have accommodated both reckless sovereign borrowing and highly speculative markets, which ensures a fateful day of reckoning. To be sure, experimental monetary policy has been instrumental in promoting the increasingly vulnerable global government finance bubble.

"Activist" central banking has been the nucleus for overstating the effectiveness - and over-promising - with respect to both monetary and fiscal policymaking. Markets and citizens alike had over years been conditioned to believe that enlightened policy ensured economic stability and rising asset prices. Accordingly, risk and leverage were readily embraced. These days, central bankers are trapped - the markets fully appreciate that they have them trapped - and it's going to be fascinating and unnerving to watch how this all plays out.

And while the ECB has badly deviated from its core principles, it does at least have some to anchor policymaking. The Bernanke Fed is completely lost at sea. Markets will now anxiously anticipate the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee's September 20/21 meeting. A divided Fed will contemplate additional stimulus measures, including more quantitative easing. There will be intense pressure to do more to support a faltering "jobless" recovery, with the expectation that chairman Bernanke will carry the day and ensure a backdrop sufficiently loose to accommodate additional fiscal stimulus.

Unlike in Europe, the markets have yet to impose austerity on Washington. And while both European and American economies have demonstrated recent weakness, in contrast to Europe our feeble recovery will continue to be underpinned by lavish federal spending. US stocks have significantly outperformed European bourses this year, and there remains considerable confidence that our monetary and fiscal measures can support economic expansion and higher stock prices. As I wrote a few weeks back, it is not difficult for most US investors to remain complacent.

At the same time, the global financial system comes under added stress each passing week. The euro again came under pressure this week. The euro has been notably resilient for the past several months, but I worry that this has only provided an opportunity for additional hedging in the marketplace to protect against potential euro weakness. Part of my analysis is that huge derivative protection (put options and such) has accumulated that would tend to increase the vulnerability of the euro to an abrupt and destabilizing decline (if key technical support levels are broken).

It has been part of my thesis that the global financial system has been especially vulnerable to de-risking and de-leveraging dynamics. I believe markets have absorbed the first phase of de-risking/de-leveraging, with meaningful stock market declines, surging Treasury prices, a widening of credit spreads, a tightening of general financial conditions and a downshift in economic activity. Importantly, this "first phase" was accompanied by significant currency market volatility - but not dramatic changes in most currency values. In particular, the euro and US dollar have traded in relatively tight trading ranges for several months now, at least partially explained by ongoing market faith that global central bankers are keen to ensure liquid and stable markets.

If current financial tumult evolves more into a 2008-style event, I would expect the next phase of de-risking/de-leveraging to be accompanied by increasing signs of dislocation in currency markets more generally. The big question remains unanswered: how big are global currency "carry trades" (short low-yielding dollar instruments to fund higher-returning assets abroad)?

An important part of the thesis is that we've reached the point where reflationary policymaking will tend to only increase uncertainty and further destabilize unsettled financial markets. Both the Fed and ECB are at respective policy crossroads and markets have ample reason to fret. Confidence is wearing thin.

WEEKLY WATCH
For the week, the S&P500 slipped 0.2% (down 6.7% y-t-d), and the Dow lost 0.4% (down 2.9%). The S&P 400 Mid-Caps declined 0.4% (down 8.2%), and the small cap Russell 2000 declined 1.2% (down 12.8%). The Banks declined 2.0% (down 28.4%), and the Broker/Dealers fell 2.2% (down 28.9%). The Morgan Stanley Cyclicals dipped 0.2% (down 19.9%), and the Transports slipped 0.3% (down 13.0%). The Morgan Stanley Consumer index gained 0.7% (down 6.8%), and the Utilities added 0.7% (up 4.9%). The Nasdaq100 gained 0.3% (down 2.3%), and the Morgan Stanley High Tech index increased 0.1% (down 14.7%). The Semiconductors declined 1.2% (down 17.1%). The InteractiveWeek Internet index rallied 1.6% (down 10.1%). The Biotechs added 0.6% (down 11.5%). With bullion rallying $55, the HUI gold index gained 3.5% (up 7.8%).

One month Treasury bill rates ended the week at one basis point and 2-month bills at 2 bps. Two-year government yields were up one basis point to 0.20%. Five-year T-note yields ended the week down 8 bps to 0.86%. Ten-year yields dropped 20 bps to 1.99%. Long bond yields sank 24 bps to 3.30%. Benchmark Fannie MBS yields fell 12 bps to 3.18%. The spread between 10-year Treasury yields and benchmark MBS yields widened 8 to 119 bps. Agency 10-yr debt spreads increased 5 to 6 bps. The implied yield on December 2012 eurodollar futures was little changed at 0.51%. The 10-year dollar swap spread increased 3 to 20 bps. The 30-year swap spread increased 5 to negative 30.5 bps. Corporate bond spreads narrowed. An index of investment grade bond risk declined 4 bps to 122 bps. An index of junk bond risk dropped 50 bps to 675 bps.

Debt issuance has slowed to almost a trickle. Investment-grade issuers included Coca-Cola $3.0bn, Commonwealth Edison $600 million, Praxair $500 million and USAA Capital $250 million.

Junk bond funds saw outflows of $96 million (from Lipper). I saw no junk issuance again this week.

I saw no convertible debt issued.

International dollar bond issuers included America Movil $4.0bn.
German bund yields dropped 15 bps to 2.01% (down 95bps y-t-d), and U.K. 10-year gilt yields declined 6 bps this week to 2.44% (down 107bps). Greek two-year yields ended the week up 275 bps to 44.52% (up 3,229bps). Greek 10-year yields rose 30 bps to 17.59% (up 513bps). Italian 10-yr yields jumped 21 bps to 5.27% (up 45bps) and Spain's 10-year yields rose 12 bps to 5.11% (down 33bps). Ten-year Portuguese yields sank 86 bps to 10.02% (up 344bps). Irish yields declined 18 bps to 8.45% (down 60bps). The German DAX equities index was little changed (down 19.9% y-t-d). Japanese 10-year "JGB" yields added 2 bps to 1.06% (down 6bps). Japan's Nikkei rallied 1.7% (down 12.5%). Emerging markets were mostly higher. For the week, Brazil's Bovespa equities index jumped 6.0% (down 18.4%), and Mexico's Bolsa recovered 3.2% (down 8.9%). South Korea's Kospi index surged


5.0% (down 8.9%). India's equities index rallied 5.8% (down 18%). China's Shanghai Exchange declined 3.2% (down 10%). Brazil's benchmark dollar bond yields dropped 16 bps to 3.61%, while Mexico's benchmark bond yields were little changed at 3.41%.

Freddie Mac 30-year fixed mortgage rates were unchanged at 4.22% (down 10bps y-o-y). Fifteen-year fixed rates declined 5 bps to 3.94% (down 44bps y-o-y). One-year ARMs slipped 4 bps to 2.89% (down 61bps y-o-y). Bankrate's survey of jumbo mortgage borrowing costs had 30-yr fixed jumbo rates down 7 bps to 4.87% (down 62bps y-o-y).

Federal Reserve Credit declined $6.7bn to $2.836 TN. Fed Credit was up $428bn y-t-d and $549bn from a year ago, or 24%. Elsewhere, Fed Foreign Holdings of Treasury, Agency Debt this past week (ended 8/31) decreased $4.2bn to $3.487 TN. "Custody holdings" were up $137bn y-t-d and $276bn from a year ago, or 8.6%.

Global central bank "international reserve assets" (excluding gold) - as tallied by Bloomberg - were up $1.593 TN y-o-y, or 18.6% to a record $10. TN. Over two years, reserves were $2.885 TN higher, for 40% growth.

M2 (narrow) "money" supply rose $17.9bn to a record $9.540 TN. "Narrow money" has expanded at a 12.2% pace y-t-d and 10.2% over the past year. For the week, Currency added $2.0bn. Demand and Checkable Deposits jumped $18.1bn, while Savings Deposits declined $3.3bn. Small Denominated Deposits fell $3.6bn. Retail Money Funds rose $4.6bn.

Total Money Fund assets increased $8.0bn last week to $2.637 TN. Money Fund assets were down $173bn y-t-d, with a decline of $191bn over the past year, or 6.8%.

Total Commercial Paper outstanding fell $19.3bn (7-wk decline of $138bn) to a 22-week low $1.098 Trillion. CP was up $126bn y-t-d, or 16% annualized, with a one-year rise of $33bn.

Global Credit Market Watch
August 31 - Bloomberg (Brian Parkin and James G. Neuger): "Europe's rescue fund would have to wait for an official request from a debt-hit government before buying its bonds in the secondary market, rules prepared for ratification by the 17 euro-area governments show. The extra step, along with German lawmakers' demand for control, add political layers that risk making the fund, known as the European Financial Stability Facility, less responsive than the European Central Bank, which has bought 115.5 billion euros ($167 billion) of bonds in the past 16 months... 'What's clear is that even if the EFSF is ostensibly equipped to react swiftly in an emergency, it will be much less dynamic than the ECB," said Daniela Schwarzer, senior analyst at the Berlin-based German Institute for International Politics and Security. "Faced with an emergency I would be inclined to put my money on the bank taking the reins of rescue action - as it has done and is doing.'"

August 31 - Bloomberg (Angeline Benoit): "Spain and Italy have joined a growing list of European Union governments pledging to enshrine fiscal discipline in legislation, a move investors say is insufficient to contain the region's debt crisis. The Spanish parliament on Sept. 2 votes on including 'the principle of budget stability' in the constitution, while Italy pledged this month to change its magna carta to adopt a balanced-budget amendment... 'Rules have been broken before,' said Olaf Penninga, who helps manage 140 billion euros ($202 billion) at Robeco Group... 'Markets will remain skeptical until they see countries really stick to them in difficult times.'"

September 2 - Bloomberg (Sapna Maheshwari): "US company bond sales fell 40% this week, capping the slowest month of issuance since May 2010, as signs mount the economic recovery is faltering."

September 1 - Bloomberg (Tim Catts): "The worst month for global corporate bond offerings since May 2010 has set the stage for a September bounce... Sales from the US to Europe and Asia tumbled 27% to $149.7 billion last month, from $206.3 billion in July... Issuance fell 36% from $233.4 billion a year earlier, making it the poorest August for bond sales since... 2004."

August 31 - Bloomberg (Lorenzo Totaro and Chiara Vasarri): "The Italian government has dropped proposed changes to pension rules agreed to this week from a 45.5 billion-euro ($65.5bn) austerity plan being discussed in parliament that aims to balance the budget by 2013. Giorgia Meloni, minister for youth and sport policy... did not say how the government would make up the 5 billion euros of lost revenue from the original plan... "

August 31 - Bloomberg (Emma Ross-Thomas): "Spain expects a 'chain of turbulence' in the next two months and must fight 'tooth and nail' to avoid having to seek a bailout, Elena Valenciano, the ruling Socialist party's campaign chief, said... 'We're probably going to get back into a chain of financial turbulence in September and October... An intervention in Spain would be a great misfortune for the country.'"

August 31 - Bloomberg (Angeline Benoit): "Spain's region of Castilla-La Mancha, run by the People's Party that polls suggest will win control of the central government in November, vowed to cut the nation's highest regional deficit by 2012 without raising taxes. Castilla-La Mancha, which had a budget gap of 6.5% of gross domestic product last year, will slash spending by 1.7 billion euros ($2.5bn) to achieve a deficit of 1.3% of GDP next year... "

September 1 - Bloomberg (Paul Tugwell): "Greek retail sales fell at the fastest rate in three years in the key summer period between mid-July and the end of August, when price-discounts are permitted, the National Federation of Greek Commerce said. Sales of goods such as furniture, books and footwear fell by an average of 25% from a year ago... "

August 31 - Bloomberg (Christine Idzelis): "Companies raised the least amount of leveraged loans this month since 2008... Companies sold $3.02 billion of the debt this month, down from $27.6 billion in July and this year's peak of $69.5 billion in February, according to Standard & Poor's... "

September 1 - Bloomberg (Lisa Abramowicz): "The riskiest bonds are diverging from higher-quality debt by the most since October 2009 as investors lose confidence that the US economy will expand enough to sustain the neediest borrowers."

Global Bubble Watch
September 1 - Reuters (Marc Jones): "Bundesbank President Jens Weidmann said... that trust in the European Central Bank could be lost if the euro zone central bank persists with crisis-fighting policies that go beyond its conventional role. ... Weidmann renewed the Bundesbank's attack on steps taken by the ECB such as buying bonds of debt-strained euro zone members, a tactic some argue oversteps Europe's no-bailout principles. He said the lines between central bank monetary policy and governments' fiscal policy had been blurred as a result of the financial and euro zone debt crises. 'In the long run this strains the trust in the central banks, and therefore for monetary policy it matters that the additional risks that have been taken on reduced again.' 'Decisions over whether to take on further additional risks would have to be made by governments and parliaments; only they are legitimised democratically to do so... '"

September 1 - Bloomberg (Anchalee Worrachate): "Italy and Spain sold bonds this week at lower yields than previous auctions, suggesting record debt purchases by the European Central Bank in the secondary market have helped to contain the nations' borrowing costs... The ECB's mandate prevents it from buying bonds directly from governments at auctions, so it purchases them in the so-called aftermarket. 'It's the ECB that virtually sets these borrowing costs for them, and not the market,' said Michael Leister, a fixed- income strategist at WestLB AG... 'Demand for these bonds remains weak. The ECB has been absolutely crucial in bringing Italian and Spanish yields down, enabling these countries to fund themselves at substantially lower rates than in the previous auctions.'"

September 2 - Bloomberg (Inyoung Hwang): "Investors increased their use of US exchange-traded funds by the most since January 2008 last month, as concern the economy is slowing prompted a shift toward bets on the direction of the entire market and industries instead of individual companies. Average daily trading volume for ETFs jumped 83% from July to 2.24 billion shares... The SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust... saw a 105% jump to 394 million per day.

Currency Watch
August 29 - Bloomberg (Scott Reyburn): "The classic-car market is dividing between the best models, whose prices are racing to records, and others that are faltering on the sales' start line, dealers say. Auction totals are beating forecasts and some sellers made bigger returns from their Ferraris this month than from volatile financial markets... 'The market has polarized,' Geneva-based auto adviser Simon Kidston said... 'Big-ticket cars are making more and more money. The rest is becoming much more difficult to sell.'"

August 31 - Bloomberg (Ilan Kolet): "A license to drive a New York City taxi is not only worth more than its weight in gold, investing in a yellow cab has been more lucrative than the yellow metal. The... cost of a New York City taxicab license has increased more than 1,000% since 1980. The individual 'medallion' - the transferable aluminum plate found on the hood of all cabs - sold for $678,000 in July... up from $2,500 in 1947."....lol

Monday, September 5, 2011

American economic survival dependent upon its ability to lay waste to the world?


American economic survival dependent upon its ability to lay waste to the world?


”At the root of it all lies the control of oil, which…which [is] crucial for the continued prosperity of the western world.”


http://mikephilbin.blogspot.com/2011/09/flight-93-in-two-places-at-once-on-911.html


http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/05/business/in-internet-age-postal-service-struggles-to-stay-solvent-and-relevant.html?_r=1



[Who can explain this US propensity for ruining great sections of the world? Why have vast blocks of Nations, stretching from N. Africa to Russia been marked under US policies of "regime change" or invasion? Repeating the pattern of Iraq throughout the region, the US/NATO are reducing targeted Nations to ruin, erasing the past decades of growth and turning them into rubble. Is the Empire's survival dependent upon upon our capacity to destroy and dehumanize others? These retrogressive policies are intended to take disobedient sectors of the Muslim world back into the stone age, where running water and electric service become vague memories and children die on a grand scale, due primarily to a lack of basic health care....




This is the policy we reveal to the world as our only foreign policy, revealing America's dirty hands in maliciously punishing vast independent sectors of the Muslim world, identical to Israeli policies in Gaza. As Mr. Bhadrakumar points out: "it is a matter of time before the narrative withers away and chilling realities take hold." The world will one day acknowledge the grim realities of the NATO assault upon the weak, though strategically important, Nations of the world. When that day comes, America will be recognized for the great evil power that it has become, in its struggle to maintain abnormal levels of prosperity, over the rights and needs of the rest of the world.
In a world dominated by Western news sources, the shared delusion is that the "Cold War is over," even though we see these convoluted geostrategic gambits being played-out, primarily to isolate Russian and Chinese interests. When the veil of the shared artificial reality, that has been woven by Western psyop specialists, is torn asunder and cast aside, then all the world will understand that the turmoil that has been unleashed had nothing to do with any Nation's national security and everything to do with maintaining Western corporate profits.]



Senior IMF Economist Expects Hard Default For Greece Soonest... Greece=Fukushima


Senior IMF Economist Expects Hard Default For Greece Soonest... Greece=Fukushima!

According to a senior IMF economist who wasn’t identified, Greece will likely face a “hard default” well before March 2012.

It could happen during 2011, and perhaps after the current round of negotiations. This acknowledgement from someone very close to the matter in a body that is heavily involved in the bailout, is quite worrying.

The current talks are around the first bailout, agreed more than a year ago. Greece definitely missed its targets. The EU /IMF delegation suspended its visit to Greece after discovering that the deficit will be higher. They are expecting fresh steps to be taken by the Greek government.

The Greek government says any more steps will only deepen the recession and make things even worse. The debt trap is quite clear at this stage.

These complications triggered not only the aforementioned expectations for a hard default, according to WSJ:

“I expect a hard default definitely before March, maybe this year, and it could come with this program review,” said a senior IMF economist who is keeping close tabs on the situation. “The chances for a second program are slim.”

A hard default means a messy one. A default that is not controlled could have a serious domino effect: it can push banks to bankruptcy (such as French banks, that are highly leveraged), and it can send bond yields of other countries much higher. A hard default for Greece also seriously endangers .

The ECB has bought Spanish and Italian bonds and managed to stabilize things: 10 year yields stood on around 5% after the intervention. The recent retreat of Italy on some of the suggested measures and the political problems of Berlusconi sent yields up once again.

All in all, the bailout mechanism secures only one thing: a crisis on every inspection. Last time, it ended with a reshuffle of the Greek governments, fresh austerity measures and violent protests on the streets of Athens.

Opposition is also growing in the donating countries. Will the current round be a chance for a change?

This is one of the things that sent EUR/USD down on Friday, despite the zero job gains in the US and the higher chances of dollar printing.

This will add to the weight on EUR/USD at the beginning of the week.

For all the European events and technical analysis, see the euro/dollar forecast.



Sunday, September 4, 2011

Full-Blown Civil War Erupts On Wall Street: As Reality Finally Hits The Financial Elite, They Start Turning On Each other...


Full-Blown Civil War Erupts On Wall Street: As Reality Finally Hits The Financial Elite, They Start Turning On Each other...


By David DeGraw, AmpedStatus.com

Full-Blown Civil War Erupts On Wall Street: As Reality Finally Hits The Financial Elite, They Turn On Each OtherFinally, after trillions in fraudulent activity, trillions in bailouts, trillions in printed money, billions in political bribing and billions in bonuses, the criminal cartel members on Wall Street are beginning to get what they deserve. As the Eurozone is coming apart at the seams and as the US economy grinds to a halt, the financial elite are starting to turn on each other. The lawsuits are piling up fast. Here's an extensive roundup:

As I reported
last week:
Collapse Roundup #5: Goliath On The Ropes, Big Banks Getting Hit Hard, It's A "Bloodbath" As Wall Street's Crimes Blow Up In Their Face

Time to put your Big Bank shorts on! Get ready for a run... The chickens are coming home to roost... The Global Banking Cartel's crimes are being exposed left & right... Prepare for Shock & Awe...
Well, well... here's your Shock & Awe:

First up, this shockingly huge $196 billion lawsuit just filed against 17 major banks on behalf of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Bank of America is severely exposed on this lawsuit. As the parent company of Countrywide and Merrill Lynch they are on the hook for $57.4 billion. JP Morgan is next in the line of fire with $33 billion. And many death spiraling European banks are facing billions in losses as well.

FHA Files a $196 Billion Lawsuit Against 17 Banks
The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), as conservator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the Enterprises), today filed lawsuits against 17 financial institutions, certain of their officers and various unaffiliated lead underwriters. The suits allege violations of federal securities laws and common law in the sale of residential private-label mortgage-backed securities (PLS) to the Enterprises.

Complaints have been filed against the following lead defendants, in alphabetical order:

1. Ally Financial Inc. f/k/a GMAC, LLC - $6 billion
2. Bank of America Corporation - $6 billion
3. Barclays Bank PLC - $4.9 billion
4. Citigroup, Inc. - $3.5 billion
5. Countrywide Financial Corporation -$26.6 billion
6. Credit Suisse Holdings (USA), Inc. - $14.1 billion
7. Deutsche Bank AG - $14.2 billion
8. First Horizon National Corporation - $883 million
9. General Electric Company - $549 million
10. Goldman Sachs & Co. - $11.1 billion
11. HSBC North America Holdings, Inc. - $6.2 billion
12. JPMorgan Chase & Co. - $33 billion
13. Merrill Lynch & Co. / First Franklin Financial Corp. - $24.8 billion
14. Morgan Stanley - $10.6 billion
15. Nomura Holding America Inc. - $2 billion
16. The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC - $30.4 billion
17. Société Générale - $1.3 billion

These complaints were filed in federal or state court in New York or the federal court in Connecticut. The complaints seek damages and civil penalties under the Securities Act of 1933, similar in content to the complaint FHFA filed against UBS Americas, Inc. on July 27, 2011. In addition, each complaint seeks compensatory damages for negligent misrepresentation. Certain complaints also allege state securities law violations or common law fraud. [
read full FHFA release]
You can read the suits filed against each individual bank here. For some more information read Bloomberg: BofA, JPMorgan Among 17 Banks Sued by U.S. for $196 Billion. Noticeably absent from the list of companies being sued is Wells Fargo.

And the suits just keep coming...

BofA sued over $1.75 billion Countrywide mortgage pool
Bank of America Corp (BAC.N) was sued by the trustee of a $1.75 billion mortgage pool, which seeks to force the bank to buy back the underlying loans because of alleged misrepresentations in how they were made. The lawsuit by the banking unit of US Bancorp (USB.N) is the latest of a number of suits seeking to recover investor losses tied to risky mortgage loans issued by Countrywide Financial Corp, which Bank of America bought in 2008. In a complaint filed in a New York state court in Manhattan, U.S. Bank said Countrywide, which issued the 4,484 loans in the HarborView Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-10, materially breached its obligations by systemically misrepresenting the quality of its underwriting and loan documentation. [read more]
Bank of America kept AIG legal threat under wraps
Top Bank of America Corp lawyers knew as early as January that American International Group Inc was prepared to sue the bank for more than $10 billion, seven months before the lawsuit was filed, according to sources familiar with the matter. Bank of America shares fell more than 20 percent on August 8, the day the lawsuit was filed, adding to worries about the stability of the largest U.S. bank.... The bank made no mention of the lawsuit threat in a quarterly regulatory filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission just four days earlier. Nor did management discuss it on conference calls about quarterly results and other pending legal claims. [read more]
Nevada Lawsuit Shows Bank of America’s Criminal Incompetence
As we’ve stated before, litigation by attorney general is significant not merely due to the damages and remedies sought, but because it paves the way for private lawsuits. And make no mistake about it, this filing is a doozy. It shows the Federal/state attorney general mortgage settlement effort to be a complete travesty. The claim describes, in considerable detail, how various Bank of America units engaged in misconduct in virtually every aspect of its residential mortgage business. [read more]
Nevada Wallops Bank of America With Sweeping Suit; Nationwide Foreclosure Settlement in Peril
The sweeping new suit could have repercussions far beyond Nevada's borders. It further jeopardizes a possible nationwide settlement with the five largest U.S. banks over their foreclosure practices, especially given concerns voiced by other attorneys general, New York's foremost among them.... In a statement, Bank of America spokeswoman Jumana Bauwens said reaching a settlement would bring a better outcome for homeowners than litigation. "We believe that the best way to get the housing market going again in every state is a global settlement that addresses these issues fairly, comprehensively and with finality. [read more]
FDIC Objects to Bank of America’s $8.5 Billion Mortgage-Bond Accord
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. is objecting to Bank of America Corp. (BAC)’s proposed $8.5 billion mortgage-bond settlement with investors, joining investors and states that are challenging the agreement. The FDIC owns securities covered by the settlement and said it doesn’t have enough information to evaluate the accord, according to a filing today in federal court in Manhattan. Bank of America has agreed to pay $8.5 billion to resolve claims from investors in Countrywide Financial mortgage bonds. The settlement was negotiated with a group of institutional investors and would apply to investors outside that group. [read more]
Fed asks Bank of America to list contingency plan: report
The Federal Reserve has asked Bank of America Corp to show what measures it could take if business conditions worsen, the Wall Street Journal said, citing people familiar with the situation. BofA executives recently responded to the unusual request from the Federal Reserve with a list of options that includes the issuance of a separate class of shares tied to the performance of its Merrill Lynch securities unit, the people told the paper. Bank of America and the Fed declined to comment to the Journal. Both could not immediately be reached for comment by Reuters outside regular U.S. business hours. [read more]
Bombshell Admission of Failed Securitization Process in American Home Mortgage Servicing/LPS Lawsuit
Wow, Jones Day just created a huge mess for its client and banks generally if anyone is alert enough to act on it. The lawsuit in question is American Home Mortgage Servicing Inc. v Lender Processing Services. It hasn’t gotten all that much attention (unless you are on the LPS deathwatch beat) because to most, it looks like yet another beauty contest between Cinderella’s two ugly sisters. AHMSI is a servicer (the successor to Option One, and it may also still have some Ameriquest servicing).

AHMSI is mad at LPS because LPS was supposed to prepare certain types of documentation AHMSI used in foreclosures. AHMSI authorized the use of certain designated staffers signing with the authority of AHSI (what we call robosinging, since the people signing these documents didn’t have personal knowledge, which is required if any of the documents were affidavits). But it did not authorize the use of surrogate signers, which were (I kid you not) people hired to forge the signatures of robosigners. The lawsuit rather matter of factly makes a stunning admission... [
read more]
Fraudclosure: MERS Case Filed With Supreme Court
Before readers get worried by virtue of the headline that the Supreme Court will use its magic legal wand to make the dubious MERS mortgage registry system viable, consider the following:

1. The Supreme Court hears only a very small portion of the cases filed with it, and is less likely to take one with these demographics (filed by a private party, and an appeal out of a state court system, as opposed to Federal court). This case, Gomes v. Countywide, was decided against the plaintiff in lower and appellate court and the California state supreme court declined to hear it

2. If MERS or the various servicers who have had foreclosures overturned based on challenges to MERS thought they’d get a sympathetic hearing at the Supreme Court, they probably would have filed some time ago. MERS have apparently been settling cases rather than pursue ones where it though the judge would issue an unfavorable precedent

3. The case in question, from what the experts I consulted with and I can tell, is not the sort the Supreme Court would intervene in based on the issue raised, which is due process (14th Amendment). But none of us have seen the underlying lower and appellate court cases, and the summaries we’ve seen are unusually unclear as to what the legal argument is. [
read more]
Iowa Says State AG Accord Won’t Release Banks From Liability
The 50-state attorney general group investigating mortgage foreclosure practices won’t release banks from all civil, or any criminal, liability in a settlement, Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller said. [read more]
Fed Launches New Formal Enforcement Action Against Goldman Sachs To Review Foreclosure Practices
The Federal Reserve Board has just launched a formal enforcement action against Goldman Sachs related to Litton Loan Services. Litton Loan is the nightmare-ridden mortgage servicing unit, a subsidiary of Goldman, that Goldman has been trying to sell for months. They penned a deal to recently, but the Fed stepped in and required Goldman to end robo-signing taking place at the unit before the sale could be completed. Sounds like this enforcement action is an extension of that requirement. [read more]
Goldman Sachs, Firms Agree With Regulator To End 'Robo-Signing' Foreclosure Practices
Goldman Sachs and two other firms have agreed with the New York banking regulator to end the practice known as robo-signing, in which bank employees signed foreclosure documents without reviewing case files as required by law, the Wall Street Journal said. In an agreement with New York's financial-services superintendent, Goldman, its Litton Loan Servicing unit and Ocwen Financial Corp also agreed to scrutinize loan files for evidence they mishandled borrowers' paperwork and to cut mortgage payments for some New York homeowners, the Journal said. [read more]
Banks still robo-signing, filing doubtful foreclosure documents
Reuters has found that some of the biggest U.S. banks and other "loan servicers" continue to file questionable foreclosure documents with courts and county clerks. They are using tactics that late last year triggered an outcry, multiple investigations and temporary moratoriums on foreclosures. In recent months, servicers have filed thousands of documents that appear to have been fabricated or improperly altered, or have sworn to false facts. Reuters also identified at least six "robo-signers," individuals who in recent months have each signed thousands of mortgage assignments -- legal documents which pinpoint ownership of a property. These same individuals have been identified -- in depositions, court testimony or court rulings -- as previously having signed vast numbers of foreclosure documents that they never read or checked. [read more]
JPMorgan fined for contravening Iran, Cuba sanctions
JPMorgan Chase Bank has been fined $88.3 million for contravening US sanctions against regimes in Iran, Cuba and Sudan, and the former Liberian government, the US Treasury Department announced Thursday. The Treasury said that the bank had engaged in a number of "egregious" financial transfers, loans and other facilities involving those countries but, in announcing a settlement with the bank, said they were "apparent" violations of various sanctions regulations. [read more]
This Is Considered Punishment? The Federal Reserve Wells Fargo Farce
What made the news surprising, of course, was that the Federal Reserve has rarely, if ever, taken action against a bank for making predatory loans. Alan Greenspan, the former Fed chairman, didn’t believe in regulation and turned a blind eye to subprime abuses. His successor, Ben Bernanke, is not the ideologue that Greenspan is, but, as an institution, the Fed prefers to coddle banks rather than punish them.

That the Fed would crack down on Wells Fargo would seem to suggest a long-overdue awakening. Yet, for anyone still hoping for justice in the wake of the financial crisis, the news was hardly encouraging. First, the Fed did not force Wells Fargo to admit guilt — and even let the company issue a press release blaming its wrongdoing on a “relatively small group.”

The $85 million fine was a joke; in just the last quarter, Wells Fargo’s revenues exceeded $20 billion. And compensating borrowers isn’t going to hurt much either. By my calculation, it won’t top $20 million. [
read more]
Exclusive: Regulators seek high-frequency trading secrets
U.S. securities regulators have taken the unprecedented step of asking high-frequency trading firms to hand over the details of their trading strategies, and in some cases, their secret computer codes. The requests for proprietary code and algorithm parameters by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), a Wall Street brokerage regulator, are part of investigations into suspicious market activity, said Tom Gira, executive vice president of FINRA's market regulation unit. [read more]
And here's part of the Collapse Roundup I wrote on August 25th, referenced in the beginning of this report - as you will see, I would probably make a lot more money as an investment adviser:

Collapse Roundup #5: Goliath On The Ropes, Big Banks Getting Hit Hard, It's A "Bloodbath" As Wall Street's Crimes Blow Up In Their Face

Collapse Roundup #5: Goliath On The Ropes, Big Banks Getting Hit Hard, Banking Cartel's Crimes Blowing Up In Their FaceTime to put your Big Bank shorts on! Get ready for a run...

The chickens are coming home to roost. Reality is catching up with the market riggers (Fed, ECB, PPT, CIA) and the "too big to fail" banks are getting whacked. Trillions of dollars in bailouts and legalized (FASB) accounting fraud cannot save these insolvent zombie banks any longer. The Grim Reaper is on the horizon and his sickle will do what paid off politicians won't, cut 'em down to size. So get your
silver stake ready, time to plunge it into their vampire squid hearts....

What about Warren Buffet? He saved Goldman Sachs with a bailout in 2008. Can he save Bank of America?...

Warren’s bailout will help BofA over the short run, but $5 billion is just a drop in the bucket when it comes to their problems. The only thing his $5 billion will accomplish is a temporary run up in stock value so everyone who has been killed on the plummeting stock price can then jump out without complete loss....

Trouble a-comin'...

Goldman Sachs TANKS After CEO Lloyd Blankfein Hires Famous Defense Lawyer

Collapse Roundup #5: Goliath On The Ropes, Big Banks Getting Hit Hard, Banking Cartel's Crimes Blowing Up In Their FaceIs the Goldman Sachs CEO facing a new lawsuit?

The market seems to think so. Goldman Sachs just tanked in minutes before the close after news that Lloyd Blankfein hired a lawyer famous for defending vilified execs. It's back up a bit since dropping over 5%, but the news is still concerning.

It's unclear whether the lawyer is for him, Goldman Sachs, or both, but Goldman Sachs's CEO Lloyd Blankfein hired Reid Weingarten, a high profile defense attorney who says "I'm used to these monstrously difficult cases where everybody hates my clients," according to Reuters.

Reuters says the hire might have something to do with accusations of Blankfein's committing perjury. Or something else:

One former federal prosecutor, who was not authorized to speak publicly, said Blankfein may have hired outside counsel after receiving a request from investigators for documents or other information. [
read full report]
Speaking of hiring lawyers...

The Global Banking Cartel's Crimes Are Being Exposed Left & Right...

Blowing Up In Their Face... Prepare for Shock & Awe...


BOOM! Moody's exposed:

MOODY'S ANALYST BREAKS SILENCE: Says Ratings Agency Rotten To Core With Conflicts
A former senior analyst at Moody's has gone public with his story of how one of the country's most important rating agencies is corrupted to the core.

The analyst, William J. Harrington, worked for Moody's for 11 years, from 1999 until his resignation last year.

From 2006 to 2010, Harrington was a Senior Vice President in the derivative products group, which was responsible for producing many of the disastrous ratings Moody's issued during the housing bubble.

Harrington has made his story public in the form of a 78-page "comment" to the SEC's proposed rules about rating agency reform....

Here are some key points:

* Moody's ratings often do not reflect its analysts' private conclusions. Instead, rating committees privately conclude that certain securities deserve certain ratings--but then vote with management to give the securities the higher ratings that issuer clients want.

* Moody's management and "compliance" officers do everything possible to make issuer clients happy--and they view analysts who do not do the same as "troublesome." Management employs a variety of tactics to transform these troublesome analysts into "pliant corporate citizens" who have Moody's best interests at heart.

* Moody's product managers participate in--and vote on--ratings decisions. These product managers are the same people who are directly responsible for keeping clients happy and growing Moody's business.

* At least one senior executive lied under oath at the hearings into rating agency conduct. Another executive, who Harrington says exemplified management's emphasis on giving issuers what they wanted, skipped the hearings altogether. [
read full report]
BOOM! The SEC Caught Covering Up Wall Street Crimes:

Matt Taibbi Exposes How SEC Shredded Thousands of Investigations

An explosive new report in Rolling Stone magazine exposes how the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission destroyed records of thousands of investigations, whitewashing the files of some of the nation’s largest banks and hedge funds, including AIG, Wells Fargo, Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America and top Wall Street broker Bernard Madoff. Last week, Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa said an agency whistleblower had sent him a letter detailing the unlawful destruction of records detailing more than 9,000 information investigations. We speak with Matt Taibbi, the political reporter for Rolling Stone magazine who broke this story in his latest article....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhENEMS_GuE&feature=player_embedded


KA-BOOM! The Fed And All Their Crony-Capitalist Cartel Members Exposed, Yet Again:

Wall Street Pentagon Papers Part III – Are The Federal Reserve’s Crimes Still Too Big To Comprehend?

Collapse Roundup #5: Goliath On The Ropes, Big Banks Getting Hit Hard, Banking Cartel's Crimes Blowing Up In Their FaceAnother day, another trillion plus in secret Federal Reserve “bailouts” revealed. Bloomberg News exposes this latest Fed “deal” after winning a long Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) legal battle to get the details on what was done with the American people’s money. Their report runs with an AmpedStatus style headline: “Wall Street Aristocracy Got $1.2 Trillion From Fed.”

The aristocracy is alive and well… thanks to the Fed, of course.

Keep in mind, this $1.2 trillion is in addition to the $16 trillion the Government Accountability Office (GAO) audit revealed and the over $2 trillion in Quantitative Easing the Fed dished out, not to mention the now continued promise of the Zero Interest Rate Policy (ZIRP). This is also separate from the $700 billion TARP program that Congress approved. This is yet another unknown secret program, throwing another mere $1.2 trillion in public money at the Wall Street elite (global banking cartel), just being revealed now.

Those of us paying attention over the past three years have had Fed crony-capitalism on steroids fatigue for awhile now. Nonetheless, this is deja vu all over again as another mindbogglingly huge story that must be covered comes to light.

Here are the details of this latest revelation:

[read full report]
Speaking of the $16 trillion GAO audit...

BOOM! GAO audit exposed, missing some vital details:

More on how the GAO's Fed audit failed to disclose some dirty secrets about BlackRock and JP Morgan

In its review of the Fed's outsourcing practices, it failed to mention the most damaging and suspicious sole-source (no bid) contract awarded to BlackRock, which was for handling the New York Fed's toxic Bear Stearns portfolio, otherwise known as Maiden Lane. This contract would generate $108,000,000 in fees and was one of the largest awarded during the bailout period, but it might also have saved JP Morgan $1.1 billion in losses from its Bear Stearns acquisition....

Also, BlackRock was also one of the managers of the NY Fed's separate $1.25 trillion MBS purchase program as part of QE1. Contrary to the lie on the NY Fed's webpage (that the MBS auctions were conducted via competitive bidding), the NY Fed's own purchasing manager, Brian Sack, admitted in a paper that, "the MBS purchases were arranged with primary dealer counterparties directly, [and] there was no auction mechanism to provide a measure of market supply."

Putting it all together, it looks like Jamie Dimon signed off on hiring BlackRock for no justifiable reason to trade the very Maiden Lane portfolio that could have caused his bank, JP Morgan, to lose up to $1.1 billion. And, it was entirely possible that BlackRock saved the portfolio by trading the MBS portion of ML with the New York Fed directly as QE1 was underway. [
read full report]
BOOM! Bear Stearns exposed:

Report Says Bear Stearns Executives Sold Illegal RMBS and Covered It Up
Former back office employees from Bear Stearns are coming out of the woodwork to explain how Tom Marano’s mortgage group cheated their own clients out of billions. This week I reported at The Distressed Debt Report, EMC insiders say they were told to make up the classification for whole loans, packaged into mortgage securities, to get them switched out of the trust. By classifying the loans as ‘prepaid’ or having ‘subsequent recoveries’ Bear employees were able to fool the trustee into giving them back loans they were not able to legally service. A move New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman is actively investigating now.

In my latest DealFlow story we hear from EMC staffers who describe how subprime loans, that would have been sold by Bear Stearns trader Jeff Verschleiser’s team, never had a proper servicing license in West Virginia when they were packaged into the residential mortgage backed security. In 2003 Bear/EMC put $100 million of subprime loans from West Virginia into a few RMBS transactions. EMC, the banks wholly owned mortgage servicing shop, would service all of Bear’s RMBS after they were sold.

A year latter, when senior executies realized the mishap instead of Bear going out and informing their regulator and applying for a license, they orchestrated a cover up and even threaten EMC employees not to talk about it. [read full report]
The big banks are getting lit up!

You shall reap what you sow.

Karma is a ... bit@h. [
read full report]

Let's end with this video. We need to keep in mind that the Federal Reserve has known about all of this criminal activity from the start. Yet, they have done everything they could, and are still trying, to keep this criminal operation up and running. As all these criminal banks begin to blow up, let's not forget who their central bank is and what they have done to the American people.

Cenk, take it away and drive the point home:

Saturday, September 3, 2011

TAPI pipeline on hold, alternative Chinese solution away from anything tied to American positions...

.

[TAPI pipeline is realistically put on hold, since all players seem to be facing-up to the dangers of Afghanistan and American failure to overcome the insurgency. Everyone seems to be gravitating towards an alternative Chinese solution and away from anything tied to the American position. If American corporations, in hand with the US Govt., cannot solve the equation of Afghanistan, so that pipeline plans can be realized, then someone else will rise to the task and to the rewards promised to those who harvest Central Asian gas and oil. From other reports on the international meeting of Asian leaders, comes word that they are all pushing to create the CAREC Corridor 5 project. This proposed strategic corridor connects China all the way to Pakistan and everything in between. The route bypasses Turkmenistan, but it is assumed from reports that China expects to more than double the amount of Turkmen gas flowing to China and the following report that China is loaning Turkmenistan billions to develop the possibly defunct TAPI pipeline, that China will get its money's worth of Turkmen gas. Actually, the Corridor 2 Project connects both Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan to the Corridor 5 pipelines (SEE: Corridor 2).

In this case is really is true for American investors that "if you snooze, you lose," or would it be more accurate to say that American failure to achieve its militarist plans in both Afghanistan and in Iraq have cost Western oil majors the Iraqi and Central Asian bonanza that they have lusted so hard over, all of these years?]


larger map

09/02/2011

Gas pipeline through Afghanistan – Emergency cancellation?

Dmitry Verkhoturov

If the Americans leave southern Afghanistan, the Afghan forces can not guarantee the security of the pipeline. In the picture: After signing a framework agreement on construction of a trans-Afghan pipeline (TAPI).Ashgabat, 2010

Not so long ago been completed negotiations on TAPI gas pipeline that would carry Turkmen gas fields Dovletabad through Afghanistan and Pakistan to India. Parties managed to overcome all differences, all the political difficulties, and in May 2011 Afghan parliament approved the construction start scheduled for 2012. Turkmenistan has already begun preparations for the construction, which includes the equipment building industry and the railroad Atamurat – Akin – Andkhoy.

The collapse of the safeguards

In early 2011 the U.S. put forward a plan for further strategy in Afghanistan, which threatens the project a complete failure. A former deputy adviser to U.S. President for National Security Robert Blackville suggested, referring to the high losses and the inability to keep the south of Afghanistan, go to “Plan B”. The plan calls for a sharp reduction in foreign military contingent from 150 thousand to 30-50 thousand people, and challenge him to Kabul and northern Afghanistan. The whole of southern Afghanistan province of Kunar province, Nimroz to left, so the Taliban.

It comes even to the point that Robert Blackville said: “At the same time, Washington must recognize that the” Taliban “sooner or later will acquire control over the Pashtun south and east, and to prevent such an outcome, will pay an unacceptably high price.” In fact, we are talking about recreating the Taliban government in some of his form in the form of Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, in the form of “Pashtunistan” or else under some other name, with forms of management, which will strongly resemble the device Taliban government in 1999 -2001, respectively.

All agreements on the construction of the TAPI held on Afghan security guarantees and the construction of the pipeline. When these agreements were signed, it was assumed that the Americans will stay in Afghanistan long enough to become stronger Afghan army and managed to take control of security. But if the Americans leave southern Afghanistan, the Afghan forces can not guarantee the security of the pipeline, which passes through the southern provinces. Even if you start building it in 2012, its completion would be in question because about a thousand kilometers of gas pipeline will pass through the territory on which military operations are possible. Delays in construction as a threat to the failure of the project. Thus, the U.S. “Plan B” destroys everything that participating countries have established an agreement on TAPI with great difficulty.

The Chinese word

Contrary to current opinion, China has always stood for talks on TAPI, and the entire project is impossible without China’s participation. Typically, experts believe that China was not profitable direction of Turkmen gas to the southern route, since China imports of Turkmen gas via a pipeline Turkmenistan – China, entered service in late 2009 and has plans to expand its capacity.

However, this is only part of the picture. If we take into account the fact that Pakistan has become an important ally of China, and to take into account the activity of the Chinese investment in countries of the region (Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Turkmenistan), it becomes obvious that the construction of the TAPI very much in the interests of Beijing . Firstly, the fuel and economic development opportunities for Pakistan – an important ally. Second, these are the conditions for large-scale investment in the whole sector of countries, particularly in Pamir region. TAPI implementation makes this region so far very little affected by economic development, a major area for investment and a source of valuable raw materials for Chinese industry. Do not forget that the Pamir and Hindu Kush are numerous mineral deposits, including rare metals and uranium. In addition, the gas required and Chinese companies in the mining of minerals such as copper deposit Aynak. A major gas pipeline allows you to build copper plant and take out no ore concentrate and blister copper suitable for electrolytic refining.

December 12, 2010 signed a framework agreement on TAPI gas pipeline construction, and only April 27, 2011 the Bank of China has provided “Turkmengaz” a large loan of $ 4.1 billion for 10 years under the terms of repayment of gas supplies. It is clear that such a large loan provides for a major investment in a large construction site, and at that time there was only one project of this magnitude – TAPI.

American “Plan B” shuffled the cards and broke all the calculations. However, China is still a loser will not. August 27, 2011 China National Petroleum Corp. - Chinese oil company, said that before 2015 there are plans to double the power of the Turkmenistan – China, and to increase the volume of gas imports to 55-60 billion cubic meters. meters per year. Currently imports account for August this year, 13.6 billion cubic meters. meters, to 2012, should reach 30 billion cubic meters. meters. The increase in the plan in 2015 to 60 billion cubic meters. meters – it’s just turning the volume of gas that had to go to the TAPI gas pipeline Turkmenistan – China. Already granted to credit “Turkmengaz” just build a pipeline in a different direction.

Well, the Chinese policy has always led a leisurely policies and preferred not to risk it.Obviously, after analyzing the situation in Afghanistan, they decided to postpone the TAPI to better times and not keep it up until the situation changes and stabilizes. China has nothing to lose, and can provide 4-5 billion dollars in construction and in 2015, and in 2020 and later.

Implications for Afghanistan

Such a solution, of course, greatly complicates the situation in Afghanistan. First, it is a significant deceleration of economic development, which determines in particular the construction of the armed forces and security. Second, the Afghan government is deprived of important arguments in the process of national reconciliation. Prior to that, it could promise the militants, and even major commanders, the broad perspective associated with the pipeline. Judging by the statement of support for Gulbuddin Hekmatyar construction with preliminary agreement had been. As now the situation, and whether the actual agreement on – debatable.

All this means that opportunities to persuade fighters to disarm some prospects for a peaceful life and legal income for the Afghan government have fallen significantly, and now, willy-nilly have to balk at the increased military pressure on the Taliban and try to inflict the greatest possible damage to Taliban squads.

Americans are ill-considered words and his speeches, of course, have already caused great damage to Afghanistan’s security, disrupted long-term agreement that would guarantee an end to the war years 2014-2015. Now everything is delayed. That’s how important it is to some experts to Washington to think through their proposals before, and only then to express them out loud.

However, do not lose heart. Palliative Turkmen gas can be Turkmen electricity, and railroad Atamurat – Akin – Andkhoy good in itself, and outside gas pipeline project. Temporarily, until the TAPI build fails, it is necessary to advance the project of development of the Afghan-Turkmen cooperation and industrial development in the border with Turkmenistan provinces. This is one of the most peaceful areas of Afghanistan, and projects it may be of interest to investors from different countries.

Afghanistan joins Tajikistan, Kyrgyz Republic Cross-Border Transport Accord....

SOURCE

The corridor starts at Torkham, on the border with Afghanistan, which is also used by Nato as its supply route. –

ISLAMABAD: Afghanistan, Kyrgyz Republic and Tajikistan have finalized an agreement that will allow Afghanistan to take part in a cross-border transport accord recently ratified by the two Central Asian countries.

The CBTA, signed under the framework of the Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation (CAREC) program, will ease the movement of goods, vehicles, and people across international borders, said a press statement received here from Asian Development Bank.

Vehicles and goods from participating countries will be able to cross designated borders faster, thanks to streamlined customs inspections and reduced requirements to transfer shipments between vehicles.

Established in 2001, CAREC brings together Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, the People’s Republic of China (PRC), Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Mongolia, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan.

It promotes the implementation of regional projects in energy, transport, and trade facilitation.

Senior officials from the Central Asian neighbors agreed on Afghanistan’s accession to the Cross-Border Transport Agreement (CBTA) at a meeting in Bangkok, Thailand. Kyrgyz Republic and Tajikistan signed the CBTA in December 2010.

To date, member governments, ADB, and other international financial institutions have approved over 100 CAREC-related projects worth about $16 billion.

These projects include six land transport corridors that cover 3,600 km of roads and 2,000 km of railway while they traverse the CAREC region north-south and east-west, linking Europe, East Asia, South Asia, the Middle East, and beyond.

Officials from Afghanistan, Kyrgyz Republic, and Tajikistan will sign a protocol on Afghanistan’s accession to the CBTA at the 10th CAREC Ministerial Conference to be held in Baku, Azerbaijan in November 2011.

The CBTA will ultimately connect East Asia and the Arabian Sea through Central Asia, specifically along the route of CAREC Corridor 5.

In Afghanistan, the Corridor starts at Torkham at the border with Pakistan, continuing through Jalalabad to Kabul, Kunduz, and Shirkhan Bandar.

From the Tajikistan border crossing of Nizhni Pianj, Corridor 5 passes through Kurgan Tyube, Dushanbe, and Karamik. In the Kyrgyz Republic, it runs to the PRC border via Karamik, Sary Tash, and Irkeshtan....


Friday, September 2, 2011

ExxonMobil/Rosneft Agreement an Indication that New World Order Has Already Arrived....and that Moscow has joined with the Axis of Evils...

.Exxon Mobil Agrees Arctic Oil Exploration Deal With Russian Oil Company
.Russian president Vladimir Putin (right) and Rex Tillerson of ExxonMobil during the signing of the arctic oil exploration deal....



ExxonMobil/Rosneft Agreement an Indication that New World Order Has Already Arrived....and that Moscow has joined with the Axis of Evils, but New mini-Cold Wars Heating-Up In Southern Central Asia, just to distract the Gullible...., and I would say one in two bosses is a Psycopath hiding it with Business-speak....


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2032912/One-25-bosses-psychopath-hides-charm-business-speak.html



2 09 2011

[The synchronization of American and Russian policies is the Arctic can also be seen in the plunder of Central Asian oil and gas resources. Russian endorsement of the NATO war crimes in Libya further reinforces the conclusion that the US and Russia are now partners in most things. Is this an indication that the much feared "New World Order" is already a fact, a foregone conclusion, that is now reported as a future event? If we now start to see resolution of the Caucasus disputes, especially in Nagorno-Karabakh, in order to facilitate new southern routes for European gas and oil pipelines (either Nabucco or South Stream), then we will know for certain, that in most matters, the US and Russian leaders are as one. If we realize the truth that Russia has offered only token resistance to American aggressions around the world, such as that directed against Libya and before that, Iraq, we will begin to see the hidden workings of the already functioning NWO. Our future fears are now facts.]

How Arctic oil could break new ground

As ExxonMobil beats BP to strike a deal for Russian Arctic oil, what does it mean for the industry – and the environment?



In an age of diminishing resources but soaring populations, the scramble for the Arctic’s riches continues. Months after BP’s rival bid fell through, US oil giant ExxonMobil has just struck a £2bn agreement to develop vast hydrocarbon resources in the Kara Sea, off Russia’s northern coast, in return for offering its Russian partner, Rosneft, assets in the US.

In one sense the deal is, of course, a very welcome development. Far from fulfilling dark prophecies of conflict and confrontation between rival governments, the Arctic’s resources are instead bringing nations closer together, moving in step with the mysterious, unpredictable pace at which regional ice is retreating: US experts, using advanced satellite information, have shown that ice in the Arctic Ocean is continuing to “decline at a brisk pace”, even if this year’s figure is not set to match the record low of 2007.

The deal represents a remarkable mutual interdependence and harmony. On the one hand, the Russian government, highly dependent on oil and gas exports for revenue, desperately needs advanced western technology and expertise if it is to have any hope of maintaining its current level of production. Meanwhile, western “super-majors” such as ExxonMobil are under constant shareholder pressure to “book reserves” by finding large sources of future revenue that will allow them to keep commercial pace with global, particularly Asian, competitors.

It is just such reserves that the Arctic appears to offer. A 2008 survey by the US Geological Survey estimated that the region appears to harbor around 13% of the world’s undiscovered oil resources and 30% of its undiscovered natural gas. And the relatively shallow waters of the Kara Sea are particularly appealing.

In this respect, this week’s agreement represents a positive step – one that will reduce political rivalry and tension between the two respective governments, both of which will have much to gain from oil revenues when the deal is put into practice.

Nonetheless, the new agreement does give one major cause for concern. For as the Deepwater Horizon catastrophe showed so painfully last year (around 5m barrels of oil were lost as a result of BP’s Macondo blow out), both parties need to give some reassurance that they will be doing their utmost to prevent and minimize any environmental mishap.

The Arctic region is particularly vulnerable to such mishaps for the obvious reason that the regional climate makes them much more likely. True, there is less ice than before – levels this year are said to be “exceptionally low” in the Kara Sea – but they can vary enormously from year to year, and icebergs, moving at fast speed, can still appear at any time of year. In difficult conditions, pipelines are not only more likely to crack, but any spillages are apt to be proportionately harder to find: it was no coincidence that BP’s other recent environmental tragedy, the Prudhoe Bay oil spill in 2006, happened in a remote area of Alaska’s North Slope.

It is true that, under the deal, the two companies have agreed to set up a joint research centre in St- Petersburg to develop new ice-resistant drilling platforms and other technology. But these could take years, or even decades, to bear fruit; and in any case the agreement says nothing about the enhanced safety standards – such as a detailed clean-up plan to deal quickly and effectively with any spillage – that need to be rigorously enforced.

The Russians have an appalling track record on environmental safety – the way they have dumped radioactive waste into Arctic waters bears ample testimony to that – while ExxonMobil’s critics allege that a company so concerned about shareholder returns could be tempted to cut costs and take environmental risks.

In particular, the two companies need to recognize that environmental safety is a matter of commercial self-interest. Any serious oil spillage would of course hugely damage their share price and, even if this remained just the stuff of nightmares, the power of the “ethical investor” should not be underestimated.

For Moscow, the costs of guarding oil installations, if they are targeted by protestors using similar tactics to those who boarded Cairn’s rig off Greenland last summer, could also be considerable. And the mere threat of such protests would also further undermine Russia’s battered image before international investors.

ExxonMobil and Rosneft could now seize this Arctic opportunity and break new commercial ground by signalling that they will respect the concerns of the environmental lobby and drill in Arctic waters only when strict safety standards have been met. And formulating and implementing those standards now offers the US, Russia and other international powers a fruitful way of working together....

[Judging from the closing statement, Medvedev and Tajik President Rahmon are apparently referring to the Rogun Dam project, which Moscow may be supporting, once again, and the renewal of military relations, possibly Tajikistan's agreeing to Moscow's desire to return its troops to the Tajik/Afghan border. The Kremlin's on-again, off-again support for the Rogun Dam project has turned on the Russian desire to appease Uzbek President Islam Karimov, who is dead-set against the dam. He has taken this stance of hard-headed resistance because of the fact that it will cut-off much of the water which normally flows to the massive Uzbek cotton crop, for at least the seven years to twelve years that it will take to fill the massive dam.

With Russia taking the side of Tajikistan and the United States and friends patching-up their feud with Karimov, perhaps regaining basing rights they once had in Uzbekistan (SEE: US Senator Lindsay Graham Meets with Uzbek President Karimov), we see the elements of a new mini-Cold War heating-up in southern Central Asia. It looks as if the Fergana Valley might be the next spot to heat-up in the American/NATO perpetual war on terror (SEE: What “Combat Zone” In Central Asia? ; Smashing Greater Central Asia – Part One ).]

Tajikistan strategic partner – Medvedev

In a statement after a meeting in Dushanbe on Friday, President Medvedev and his hosting Tajik counterpart Emomali Rakhmonov say their countries will continue to build a strategic partnership, in all bilateral and multilateral aspects. The later include coordination on the Commonwealth of Independent States, the Collective Security Treaty Organization, the Eurasian Economic Community and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.

The Presidents attach particular importance to joint hydro-power projects and to joint efforts to enforce military security in the Central Asian area....

The former Soviet states are notoriously complicated for foreign businesses. Money can be made there as quickly as they can be lost, with governments playing an active role. A U.K.-based gold miner Wednesday said it sued Uzbekistan over a joint gold mining project that went sour.

U.K.-listed miner Oxus Gold PLC’s gold-digging adventure there ended up with criminal charges of industrial espionage and an arbitration case the firm brought against the government.

Minerals-rich, fast-growing former Soviet states offer tax breaks and cheap labor force to foreign investors. Oxus enjoyed tax exemptions and other privileges its joint venture with the Uzbek government, where gold production started in 2003. But laws later changed and the favors were scrapped, while Oxus ended up with a bill from the government for back taxes and customs duties.

In February, Oxus offered to sell its stake in the venture to Uzbekistan. The following month one of its local managers was arrested and charged with industrial espionage. Oxus said it believed Uzbekistan was seeking to liquidate the business. The spokesman for the Uzbekistan government referred this correspondent to the deputy minister of justice, who wasn’t immediately available to comment.

Russian mobile operator OAO Mobile TeleSystems had its Turkmenistan licenses suspended last year due to what the local government said was the expiry of the agreement with the firm and its local unit. The company claimed the licenses and the agreement were not interconnected and launched arbitration.

“The local authorities just wait until the business is up and running, and then take it away,” a manager at a company that got into trouble in one of former Soviet countries said, speaking on the condition of anonymity....


ExxonMobil has emerged the surprising big winner from the breach made earlier this year by BP's fumbling of its blockbuster agreement with Russia's state-owned Rosneft oil company. In a $3.2 billion agreement presided over today by Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and Exxon chief Rex Tillerson, Exxon gains the hugely prized right to explore for oil and gas underneath Russia's fabulously rich Arctic region. It's the same three Arctic fields that BP lost earlier this year, and the agreement puts Exxon in the same leading catbird seat next to Rosneft that BP lost.

Chris Weafer, chief strategist for Moscow-based Troika Dialog Bank, says that given Exxon’s lobbying pull in Washington, the deal is “a major prize for Putin and has very direct implications for U.S. relations. It is a major step that puts the ‘reset’ back on track. Moscow has a new major ally in Washington.”

In an email exchange, Weafer said that as Russia works to maintain its daily production of 10 million barrels of oil a day, the deal hits at two layers of vital Russian need. “Ten million barrels a day is both an important base for the economy, but is also the justification for Moscow's geo-political standing,” he said. “It is critical for the Kremlin to maintain that average for as long as possible.”

That Exxon would horse-trade with Rosneft to obtain this sweet deal is not surprising -- the Arctic holds some 25 percent of the world's remaining untapped oil and gas reserves, according to the U.S. Geological Survey, most of it underneath Russia's part of the region. But BP had been prepared to swap shares with Rosneft for that right, and it did not seem possible that any other Big Oil company -- and certainly not Exxon -- would be willing to have Rosneft potentially sitting on its board of directors.

Exxon neatly skirted this conundrum. It did so by offering Rosneft not shares of Exxon itself, but equity participation in some of its U.S. projects. This still gives Rosneft what it cherished -- a way to break out of Russia and become a global player. And as stated, Exxon gets what it most wants -- access to the Russian Arctic.

Yet the deal is still risky. Exxon, which jealously guards its preferred methods of exploration and development and is widely regarded as the best in the business at big projects, is simply not going to listen very much to Rosneft as a partner in difficult regions such as the Arctic. The public announcement nonsensically says that the two companies will combine their respective "proprietary technology" in their venture in the Kara Sea. Just what proprietary technology does the flat-footed Rosneft have? No, all that Rosneft brings to the table is access to reserves.

In an email exchange, Exxon spokesman Alan Jeffers told me that Exxon has offered Rosneft an equity position in exploration projects in the United States "and other countries." Jeffers said:

Projects include deepwater Gulf of Mexico and tight oil properties in Texas,. We don't have any further details at this time, but Rosneft's entry will be subject to the agreement of other equity partners and approval of host governments.


Thursday, September 1, 2011

Greece is exactly like Fukushima-Daiichi, and target is a Global Monetary Authority....


The Gross National Debt....16 Trillion and counting, with over 200 Trillion USD in unfunded outlays for the crooked US Government.....


Monaco Colloquium - August 2011. The Great Game approaches its final shake of the dice. Switzerland leads a fifty-seven nation geopolitical board change. The current governments of the US, Japan, UK, Germany, France and Italy are actively excluded from executive decisions concerning the new global gold-backed financial system.

The Central bankers’ Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in 1988 in the “Basel I” regulations imposed an 8% capital reserve standard on member central banks. This almost immediately threw Japan into a 15 year economic depression. In 2004 Basel II imposed “mark to the market” capital valuation standards that required international banks to revalue their reserves according to changing market valuations (such as falling home or stock prices). The US implemented those standards in November, 2007. In December 2007 the US stock market collapsed and credit began drying up as banks withheld loans to comply with the 8% capital requirement as collateral valuations began to drop. The snowball effect of tightening credit, which reduces economic activity and values further, which resulted in further tightening of credit, etc., has produced a worldwide depression which is worsening.

Those capital standards have not been relaxed despite the crushing effects on the world economy* the credit contraction it requires has caused. Why? Because:

Bruce Wiseman

Bruce Wiseman

“The purpose of this financial crisis is to take down the U.S. dollar as the stable datum of planetary finance and, in the midst of the resulting confusion, put in its place a Global Monetary Authority [GMA - run directly by international bankers freed of any government control] -a planetary financial control organization”- Bruce Wiseman

*The U.S did modify these rules somewhat a year after the devastation had taken place here, but the rules are still fully in place in the rest of the world and the results are appalling.

The powers of financial capitalism had a far-reaching plan, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole… Their secret is that they have annexed from governments, monarchies, and republics the power to create the world’s money….- Prof. Carroll Quigley renowned, late Georgetown macro-historian (mentioned by former President Clinton in his first nomination acceptance speech), author of Tragedy and Hope. “He [Carroll Quigley] was one of the last great macro-historians who traced the development of civilization…with an awesome capability.” – Dr. Peter F. Krogh, Dean of the School of Foreign Service (Georgetown)....LOL LOL